Reviewed by Mark Buckingham
 I'd heard of foot fetishes, but I didn't know it extended to women stomping and tromping all over a guy. But hey, it takes all kinds. Regardless of my familiarity with the sub-genre, I am familiar with good site design and content, and this site has neither. It presents the guise of a network of other fetish content, but only in the fine print do they note that you're not only paying extra, but that it's recurring unless you stop them.
 The setup of the site is fairly simple, but there are redundant thumbnails and scrollbars to make it look like they have more content than they really do. Also, the 90s called and they want their Photoshop effects and Dreamweaver HTML back. Hire a Web designer who knows some better tricks. It's a worthwhile investment. All you really have here are links to pics and videos, a model list, and them tooting their horn about being on Playboy TV. You can see the PBTV appearance…for an additional fee to order it on VHS or DVD.
 The pics section is where the trouble starts. Not only is the plain-Jane site design even more prevalent here (there's a difference between "simple" and "not even trying"), and coupled with the oft-blurry and grainy images here and a bevy of butterfaces, after about two minutes I had had enough. Girl stands on guy's stomach, then stands on his face, then does it again wearing heels. Wash, rinse, repeat. No style, nothing to grab the eye. The wandering watermarks on the photos are particularly annoying. Affix it to one corner and leave it there.
 Ahh, videos. Here is where it all falls apart. There's good news and there's bad news. The good news is that the sections of the videos are only 5MB apiece. The bad news is that each is broken into several individual parts for no good reason, they run the gamut on file formats (.wmv [Windows Media], .wvx [Windows Playlist], .ram [Real Media—none of them would play either]) and randomly are posted as streaming or some other format. The streaming ones sometimes don't play, either. If they do, it's in a window the size of a nickel, and full-screening it (when it works) just exacerbates the terrible resolution. And the format that should be the most foolproof—Windows Media (.wmv)—doesn’t work if you just click it normally. It displays a whole screen of jargon characters. You MUST right-click and use Save-As to get anything. Some videos require you to log in again to watch. Some links are broken altogether. I thought the painfully outdated site aesthetic belied a pronounced efficiency just below the surface, but I was wrong. Hardly anything works the way it should, and what does is so unimpressive it's not worth watching.
 Hardcore trampling aficionados might find a smidgen to like about this site, but I'm sure there's something better out there for you. From the unimpressive content to the lackluster look of the site, to the extras that actually cost extra (a no-no in Web porn as far as I'm concerned), you're better off doing a Google search for trampling sites than spending a penny here.
 Email this review to a friend
|
